THE "PRISTINE MYTH" REVISITED
THE "PRISTINE MYTH" REVISITED
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00118.x
复制
发表时间:
2011-10-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Denevan, William M.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Denevan, William M.
Brunn, then editor of the Annals of the Association of American Geographers, of a special issue in recognition of the Columbian Quincentennial, that issue later being titled The Americas before and after. To recruit manuscripts, the editor appointed a committee consisting of Karl Butzer, BL Turner II, Brian Harley, and myself. Ultimately Butzer became the guest editor. The authors of the special issue were under tight time constraints. They conceived the contents in mid-, drafted manuscripts by early, and revised them in the spring. The association had scheduled publication for a September date but wanted the issue available for the th International Geographical Congress in Washington, DC in August. Thus publication was actually in early August one of the fastest Annals assembled in recent times. This was despite Harley’s intervening death after he had drafted a long and rough article with dozens of illustrations. Butzer reduced this to manageable size and coherence in addition to writing his own twoand-one-half articles and editing everything else in the issue. Congress attendees received free copies, so that issue received a greater distribution than usual. I chose to write on the pristine myth, given my long awareness of pre- human impacts, reflecting my own Berkeley influences from Carl Sauer, Erhard Rostlund, and James Parsons as well as my own research, plus my emerging belief that a pristine myth does indeed exist. Certainly I was motivated when, in Meriter Hospital for surgery in Madison in the summer of, I was given Kirkpatrick Sales best seller The Conquest of Paradise. A major point of the book is that the colonial Europeans transformed nature in the Americas, whereas the Indian impact had been benign or nonexistent. I thought, loaded with morphine,“Such innocence!”