Effect of Morality for Automated Negotiating Agents: A Preliminary Result

Effect of Morality for Automated Negotiating Agents: A Preliminary Result
复制标题

道德对自动谈判代理的影响:初步结果

DOI:
10.1007/978-981-15-5869-6_2
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Takayuki Ito
Takayuki Ito
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takayuki Ito

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们分析了道德在基于Agent的自动谈判中的作用。诱惑条件下基于自我控制的公理化决策模型受到了广泛的关注。在这里,自我控制和羞耻被建模为道德的心理成本,它们被明确地纳入效用函数。这是因为行为经济学的最新进展已经通过实验证明,真实的决策不是简单地基于单一的价值标准,而是基于多个价值标准。Gul和Pesendorfer [8]首先提出了一个基于自我控制和诱惑的决策模型(因此称为GP模型),此后它得到了扩展。Dillenberger和Sadowski [6]在GP模型的基础上提出了一种基于羞耻(道德)的效用模型,其中代理人面临自私和道德之间的权衡。在本文中,我们应用基于道德的效用模型的自动谈判代理人和分析的道德自动谈判和相关的共识的形成的影响。
In this paper, we analyze the effect of morality in agent-based automated negotiations. Much attention has been given to the axiomatic decision-making model based on self-control under the presence of temptation. Here, self-control and shame are modeled as the mental costs of morality, and they are explicitly incorporated in the utility function. This is because the recent advances in behavioral economics have experimentally proved that real decision making is not simply based on a single value criterion but on multiple value criteria. Gul and Pesendorfer [8] first proposed a decision-making model based on self-control and temptation (thus called the GP model), and since then it has been extended. Dillenberger and Sadowski [6] proposed a shame (morality)-based utility model based on the GP model, in which an agent faces the trade-off between its selfishness and morality. In this paper, we apply a morality-based utility model to automated negotiation agents and analyze the effect of morality on automated negotiation and the related consensus-making.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007-01
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Takayuki Ito;Hiromitsu Hattori;M. Klein
通讯作者: Takayuki Ito;Hiromitsu Hattori;M. Klein