Public geography and the politics of circulation
Public geography and the politics of circulation
复制标题
公共地理学和流通政治
DOI：
10.1177/2043820613486427
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
27.5
通讯作者：
David Beer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David Beer
越来越多的人认为，新媒体为地理学家和社会研究人员提供了发展更公开形象的机会。对Kitchin等人的回应。(2013)，本文探讨了使用这样的平台来交流研究结果和想法的影响。这一回应探索了新媒体的潜在发展，这些发展似乎塑造了Kitchin等人在S的文章中描述的经历。在这里，有人认为定义新媒体的“流通政治”(比尔，2013)既产生了积极的结果，也产生了Kitchin等人的焦虑和问题。在他们的文章中概述了。基于这一观察，这篇文章建议，为了让学术研究人员最大限度地利用新媒体的交流潜力，他们可能还需要努力详细了解数据流通的政治，他们的想法将暴露在这些政治中。此外，这篇文章还建议，我们需要做好准备，因为我们的研究有了自己的生命。
New media are increasingly seen to provide opportunities for geographers and social researchers to develop a more public profile. In response to Kitchin et al. (2013), this article explores the implications of using such platforms for communicating research findings and ideas. This response explores the underlying developments in new media that appear to have shaped the experiences described in Kitchin et al.’s article. Here it is argued that the ‘politics of circulation’ that defines new media (Beer, 2013) generated both the positive outcomes and the anxieties and problems that Kitchin et al. outlined in their article. Based upon this observation, this piece suggests that in order for academic researchers to make the most of the communicative potential of new media, they might need to also work towards a detailed understanding of the politics of data circulations to which their ideas will be exposed. Alongside this, the article suggests that we will need to prepare ourselves as our research takes on a life of its own.