Managing and sharing research data, a guide to good practice
Managing and sharing research data, a guide to good practice
复制标题
管理和共享研究数据，良好实践指南
DOI：
10.1080/23257962.2015.1007850
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tim Gollins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tim Gollins
作为一个具有计算科学、信息安全、信息管理和数字保存背景，但没有社会科学背景或知识的人，我敏锐地意识到我并不代表本书的主要读者。此外，我的大部分经验都是在公务员部门而不是学术研究环境中处理信息的操作和实际挑战。因此，我带着一些紧张的心情接受了这篇评论。在许多有关信息和/或记录管理的演示文稿和书籍中，作者有一种不幸的倾向，即采用一种让人想起标志性的严肃图书管理员的语气，图书管理员只要在角框眼镜上投以不赞成的目光，就可以要求遵守“规则”。许多人还热衷于对“应该”或“必须”完成的任务进行理性论证，以确保信息或记录以有用的形式保存下来，但很少使用他们所面对的用户的术语，而是使用信息管理者本身的术语和价值观。不幸的是，对于此类请求的读者来说，规定的活动似乎常常妨碍手头的任务，无论这项任务是公共当局的管理还是社会科学研究。
As someone with a background in computing science, information security, information management and digital preservation, but no background or knowledge of the Social Sciences, I am acutely conscious that I am not representative of a key audience for this book. Also, most of my experience is in the operational and practical challenges of dealing with information in the Civil Service rather than an academic research environment. So it is with some nervousness that I have approached this review. In many of the presentations and books on information and/or records management, there is an unfortunate tendency for authors to adopt a tone reminiscent of the iconic stern librarian, who with a single disapproving glance over horn rimmed glasses can demand obedience to the ‘rules’. Many also indulge in intellectual justification of tasks that ‘Should’or ‘Must’be done to ensure that information or records survive in a useful form, but rarely use the terms of the users they are addressing, instead they use the terms and values of the information managers themselves. Unfortunately, for the reader of such entreaties, the prescribed activities often appear to get in the way of the task at hand, whether this task is the administration of a public authority or research in the Social Sciences.