Strategic processing during comprehension
Strategic processing during comprehension
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.615
复制
发表时间：
1999-12-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Graesser, AC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Magliano, JP;Trabasso, T;Graesser, AC
本研究提出了三个问题：读者在策略性阅读时的灵活性如何？策略加工是如何受到文本属性的影响的？一些策略是否比其他策略更能提高文本记忆力？参与者阅读简短的叙述，并大声思考，并指示解释，预测，联想或理解。有声思维方案被用来预测其他参与者的句子阅读时间，这些参与者使用相同的策略进行默读。结果表明，读者能够策略性地控制他们产生的推论。然而，战略控制是有代价的，因为它限制了用于其他推理的资源。此外，策略处理受到文本的严重限制。基于文本的解释发生时，有一个可识别的因果关系的先行词在前面的文本。基于知识的推理发生在没有先行词和引入新的人物和对象时。这些影响发生在不同的阅读策略中。阅读解释导致更好的记忆，但只有当阅读默默。
This study addresses 3 questions: How flexible are readers when reading strategically? How is strategic processing affected by properties of the text? and Do some strategies lead to better text retention than others? Participants read short narratives and thought aloud with an instruction to either explain, predict, associate, or understand. The think-aloud protocols were used to predict sentence reading times for other participants who read silently with the same strategies. The results indicated that readers are capable of strategically controlling the inferences that they generate. However, strategic control comes at some cost in that it limits the resources devoted to other inferences. Furthermore, strategic processing is heavily constrained by a text. Text-based explanations occurred when there was an identifiable causal antecedent in the prior text. Knowledge-based inferences occurred when there were no antecedents and when new characters and objects were introduced. These effects occurred across reading strategies. Reading to explain led to better memory, but only when reading silently.