Who got their way? Advocacy coalitions and the Irish climate change law
Who got their way? Advocacy coalitions and the Irish climate change law
复制标题
谁得逞了？
DOI：
10.1080/09644016.2018.1458406
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Tuomas Ylä‐Anttila
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Paul M. Wagner;Tuomas Ylä‐Anttila
哪些组织在2015年爱尔兰气候法中反映了他们对两个有争议问题的立场，倡导联盟在政策过程中发挥了什么作用？这些问题的答案从理论上从倡导联盟框架（ACF），并进行网络分析的调查数据收集的组织参与国家气候政策进程。该研究发现，一些机构重要或经济上强大的组织，特别是那些参与农业部门，以及政府政党看到他们的偏好反映在法律中。这导致立法排除了具有约束力的减排目标，使其与其他欧洲国家引入的类似法律不同。支持加强监管的组织组成了一个联盟，为自己的立场辩护，但他们基本上没有如愿以偿。
ABSTRACT Which organisations saw their positions on two contentious issues reflected in the Irish climate law of 2015, and what role did advocacy coalitions play in the policy process? These questions are answered drawing theoretically from the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) and by conducting a network analysis of survey data collected from the organisations involved in the national climate policy process. The study finds that several institutionally important or economically powerful organisations, particularly those involved in the agricultural sector, as well as the government parties saw their preferences reflected in the law. This resulted in legislation that excluded binding emission reductions targets, differentiating it from similar laws introduced in other European countries. Organisations in favour of stronger regulation formed a coalition to advocate for their positions, but they largely failed to get their way.