Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies
Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x
复制
发表时间：
2002-07-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Reicher, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Levine, M;Cassidy, C;Reicher, S
本文概述了旁观者干预研究的一种新方法。使用来自自我分类理论（特纳，霍格，奥克斯，赖歇尔，和韦瑟雷尔，1987）的见解，我们探讨了社会类别的关系，在身体暴力的背景下。本文描述了两个实验，操纵（a）旁观者和其他旁观者，（B）旁观者和受害者之间的社会类别关系。分析表明，旁观者只有在他们是群体内而不是群体外的成员时才有影响力。此外，旁观者更有可能帮助那些被描述为群体内而不是群体外成员的受害者。总体而言，研究结果表明，在制定战略，以促进旁观者干预的自我分类的角度来看，一个重要的作用。
This paper outlines a new approach to the study of bystander intervention. Using insights derived from self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987), we explore the social category relations among those present in the context of physical violence. The paper describes two experiments that manipulate the social category relations between (a) bystander and fellow bystanders, and (b) bystander and victim. Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in-group rather than out-group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in-group as opposed to out-group members. Overall, the findings suggest an important role for a self-categorization perspective in developing strategies to promote bystander intervention.