A comparison of stroke distance error from dominant and non-dominant putting stance in professional and novice golfers

A comparison of stroke distance error from dominant and non-dominant putting stance in professional and novice golfers
复制标题

职业高尔夫球手和新手高尔夫球手占主导地位和非占主导地位的推杆姿势的击球距离误差的比较

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Ichikawa
D. Ichikawa
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Suzuki;Y. Manabe;H. Arakawa;J. Sheahan;I. Okuda;D. Ichikawa

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

每个高尔夫球手都需要在果岭上执行精确的推杆技术,但对于职业高尔夫球手(PG)来说尤其如此。当PG从他们的优势位置推球时,他们有非常高的杯赛成功率。然而,为了阐明这一原因,使用目标推杆任务而不是杯式推杆任务是相关的。在本研究中,我们设计了一个推杆任务来评价中锋的推杆能力。采用优势和非优势两种推杆姿势,在一周内进行了4次推杆任务,并与承担相同任务的高尔夫新手(NG)进行了比较。结果表明,在2m目标的优势和非优势姿态下,无论是纵向距离、横向距离还是直接距离测量,PG的距离误差都显著小于NG。然而,优势和非优势推杆姿势在所有距离误差变量上都没有显著差异。纵向距离(总距离误差)的分析进一步分为远侧,即超过目标的推杆的球与目标的距离(远侧距离:+)和近侧,即未达到目标的推杆的球与目标的距离(近侧距离:-)。在优势和非优势推杆姿势下,NG和PG的远侧(+)距离比率均显著高于非优势推杆姿势。与近侧距离(-)(14.1%)相比,PG距离优势推杆姿势的远侧距离(+)率(85.9%)显著升高(85.9%)。反之,NG中优势推杆姿势的远侧率为54.7%,更接近近侧(43.7%)。从第一天开始,PG表现出明显比NG更接近目标的能力,而且从第三天开始,PG明显减少了他们的总距离误差。这些结果表明,从最初的测试来看,PG不仅在其优势手中具有较高的推杆准确率,而且在其非优势手中也具有较高的推杆准确率。这也表明,PG有一种强烈的推杆技术倾向,从他们占主导地位的推杆姿势略微超过推杆。在这项研究中,研究表明,即使在低压环境中也会发生这种情况。
Every golfer needs to execute a precise putting skill on the green but this is especially the case for professional golfers (PG). PG have a very high cup-in success rate when putting from their dominant stance. However, to clarify this reason it is relevant to use a target putting task rather than a cup-in putting task. In this study, we designed a putting task to evaluate putting ability in PG. The putting task was carried out 4 times in one week using both dominant and non-dominant putting stances and compared with novice golfers (NG) who undertook the same task. The results showed that the PG had significantly lower distance error than NG in both dominant and non-dominant putting stance from a 2m target when measured for distance from the target lengthways, laterally, and directly. However, there were no significant different between dominant and non-dominant putting stances in all distance error variables. Analysis of lengthways distance (Total distance error) was further divided into far-side, which is the distance between the ball and target of a putt that overshot the target (Far-side distance: +) and near-side, which is the distance between the ball and target of a putt that did not reach the target (Near-side distance: -). The Far-side (+) distance rate of NG and PG was significantly higher in both dominant and non-dominant putting stances. PG had a significantly high rate (85.9%) of Far-side distance (+) from dominant putting stance when compared to Near-side distance (-) (14.1%). Oppositely, Far-side rate from the dominant putting stance in NG was 54.7%, which was closer to Near-side (43.7%). From DAY1 PG showed a significantly higher ability to put the ball nearer to the target than NG from both putting stance and further significantly reduced their Total distance error from DAY3. These results indicate that PG not only had a high putting accuracy in their dominant hand from the initial test but also in their non-dominant hand. It also showed that PG have a strong putting skill tendency to slightly overshoot a putt from their dominant putting stance. In this study, it was shown that this occurs even in a low-pressure environment.