Efficacy of light versus tryptophan therapy in seasonal affective disorder

Efficacy of light versus tryptophan therapy in seasonal affective disorder
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00053-6
复制
发表时间:
1998-07-01
影响因子:
6.6
通讯作者:
Gendron, MJ
Gendron, MJ
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ghadirian, AM;Murphy, BEP;Gendron, MJ

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:虽然光疗法已成为季节性情感障碍(SAD,冬季抑郁症)患者的公认治疗方法,但几乎40%的患者没有反应,需要替代治疗。方法:采用重复测量设计,在13例SAD患者(11例女性,2例男性)中研究了光与色氨酸对SAD的治疗效果。给予光治疗2周或色氨酸治疗4周,间隔一周的洗脱期。在每次治疗开始和结束时采用改良汉密尔顿抑郁量表(SIGH-SAD)对所有患者进行评估。结果:4例(31%)患者对两种治疗均无反应。四名抗色氨酸患者对光疗法有反应,而一名抗光疗法的患者对色氨酸有反应。停止光治疗后复发迅速,但停止色氨酸治疗后没有复发。结论:光(p = 0.012)和色氨酸(p = 0.014)对SAD都有显著的治疗效果,它们彼此没有显著差异。停止治疗后残留药代动力学效应之间可能存在时间差。局限性:研究的群体较小。这是一项开放研究。临床相关性:色氨酸在治疗SAD方面与光疗法同样有效,但色氨酸停药后复发可能发生得更慢。(C)1998年Elsevier Science B.V.
Background: Although light therapy has become the accepted treatment for patients suffering from seasonal affective disorder (SAD, winter depression), almost 40% of these patients do not respond, and require an alternative treatment. Methods: The therapeutic effects of light versus tryptophan on SAD were studied in a repeated measures design in 13 SAD patients (11 women, 2 men). Light therapy for 2 weeks or tryptophan for 4 weeks was given, separated by a one week washout period. All were assessed with the modified Hamilton Depression Rating scale (SIGH-SAD) at the beginning and end of each treatment. Results: Four (31%) of the patients did not respond to either therapy. Four tryptophan-resistant patients responded to light therapy, while one Light therapy-resistant patient responded to tryptophan. Relapse occurred rapidly after stopping light therapy but not after stopping tryptophan therapy. Conclusions: There were significant therapeutic effects of both light (p = 0.012) and tryptophan (p = 0.014) on SAD, which were not significantly different from each other. There may be a time difference between the residual pharmacokinetic effects after stopping therapy. Limitations: The groups studied were small. This was an open study. Clinical Relevance: Tryptophan was equally effective to light therapy in treating SAD, but relapse after withdrawal of tryptophan probably occurs more slowly. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.