Software must be recognised as an important output of scholarly research

Software must be recognised as an important output of scholarly research
复制标题

软件必须被视为学术研究的重要成果

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Katz
D. Katz
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Jay;R. Haines;D. Katz

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

软件现在是学术研究的核心。在这里,我们认为,以及从方法论的角度来看是重要的,软件应该,在许多情况下,被认为是一个研究成果,相当于学术论文。本文讨论了软件在研究中可能发挥的不同作用,并强调了软件与研究可持续性和可重复性之间的关系。它描述了与引用和审查软件的过程相关的挑战,这些过程与用于论文的过程不同。我们的结论是,虽然软件输出不一定适合目前的出版模式,有大量的积极工作正在进行中,可能会在解决这个问题的影响。
Software now lies at the heart of scholarly research. Here we argue that as well as being important from a methodological perspective, software should, in many instances, be recognised as an output of research, equivalent to an academic paper. The article discusses the different roles that software may play in research and highlights the relationship between software and research sustainability and reproducibility. It describes the challenges associated with the processes of citing and reviewing software, which differ from those used for papers. We conclude that whilst software outputs do not necessarily fit comfortably within the current publication model, there is a great deal of positive work underway that is likely to make an impact in addressing this.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.86
发表时间: 2016-09-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Smith, Arfon M.;Katz, Daniel S.;Niemeyer, Kyle E.
通讯作者: Niemeyer, Kyle E.