On the Robustness of Solution Strategy Classifications: Testing the Stability of Dynamic Spatial Tasks on a One-Year Test-Retest Basis
On the Robustness of Solution Strategy Classifications: Testing the Stability of Dynamic Spatial Tasks on a One-Year Test-Retest Basis
复制标题
关于解决方案策略分类的鲁棒性：在一年的重测基础上测试动态空间任务的稳定性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Santacreu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. J. Contreras;V. Rubio;Daniel Peña;J. Santacreu
个体在解决空间任务时的表现差异可以部分地由所使用的策略的差异来解释。在研究这种策略时，出现了两个主要困难：策略本身的识别和策略随时间的稳定性。在本研究中，根据佩纳、孔特雷拉斯、施和桑塔克雷乌（2008）描述的程序，策略被分为三类：分段（分析）、整体反馈依赖和整体计划。一组人进行了两次评估，一年的测试，重测的基础上。在测试之间的1年间隔期间，参与者无法准备本研究中使用的特定测试或类似测试。结果发现，60%的人在整个测试过程中保持相同的策略。当战略发生变化时，它们通常是由于更好的战略。这些结果证明了使用基于策略的程序来研究空间任务中的个体差异的鲁棒性。
Individual differences in performance when solving spatial tasks can be partly explained by differences in the strategies used. Two main difficulties arise when studying such strategies: the identification of the strategy itself and the stability of the strategy over time. In the present study strategies were separated into three categories: segmented (analytic), holistic-feedback dependent, and holistic-planned, according to the procedure described by Pena, Contreras, Shih, and Santacreu (2008). A group of individuals were evaluated twice on a 1-year test-retest basis. During the 1-year interval between tests, the participants were not able to prepare for the specific test used in this study or similar ones. It was found that 60% of the individuals kept the same strategy throughout the tests. When strategy changes did occur, they were usually due to a better strategy. These results prove the robustness of using strategy-based procedures for studying individual differences in spatial tasks.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
--
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just
通讯作者：
M. Just