Transnationalities, Bodies, and Power: Dancing Across Different Worlds

Transnationalities, Bodies, and Power: Dancing Across Different Worlds
复制标题

跨国性、身体和权力:跨越不同世界的舞蹈

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
0.3
通讯作者:
C. Picart
C. Picart
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Picart

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在开始之前,让我先确定我发言的基础(无论多么起伏)。西方哲学受现代主义和科学传统的影响,将理性(事实内容)置于民族精神(性格)和悲情(情感诉求)之上。然而,在尼采的指导下,培养对修辞和哲学的欣赏,我认为关注这三个方面是很重要的:谁在说话,她或他如何说话(以及为谁说话),她或他说了什么(以及为什么)。我所处的位置,正如我在早期的《来自外部的内部笔记》一书中所概述的那样,跨越了,试图跨越,倍增存在和成为的混合领域?永远在内部和外部,谈判分歧,并试图与他人合作,翻译跨越不确定性,知道翻译,最终,永远不会完美或准确。
Prior to beginning, let me start with identifying the ground (however undulating) from which I speak. Western philosophy, as influenced by the modernist and scientific traditions, privileges logos (factual content) over ethos (character) and pathos (emotional appeal). Yet having been mentored, very effectively, by Nietzsche, to nurture an appreciation for both rhetoric and philosophy, I believe it is important to pay attention to all three: to who speaks, how she or he speaks (and for whom), and what she or he says (and why). The position from which I spring, as outlined in an earlier book, Inside Notes from the Outside, moves across, attempting to translate across, multiply hybrid realms of being and becoming?of being perpetually both inside and outside, negotiating differences and attempting, in collaboration with others, to translate across incommensurabilities, knowing that translation, ultimately, can never be perfect or exact.1 That, to me, is not sufficient reason to give up trying.