Exclusion and inclusion in identification: regulation, displacement and data justice
Exclusion and inclusion in identification: regulation, displacement and data justice
复制标题
识别中的排除和包含：监管、转移和数据正义
DOI：
10.1080/02681102.2020.1811943
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
L. Taylor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aaron Martin;L. Taylor
在世界范围内，身份识别制度规范着人们与国家和商业机构的互动。这些制度承诺提供获得资源和权利的机会，同时也促进人民对国家的可见度，从而促进他们的治理能力。对许多人来说，证明自己的身份并不困难;然而，据估计，有10亿人没有正式的身份证明。与此同时，人道主义部门正在经历一场转型，其中数字身份、移动的连接和数字金融是核心特征。通过数据正义透镜，本文探讨了客户识别制度在两个国家的情况下，大量流离失所的人口：乌干达和孟加拉国。这两个案例揭示了管理难民身份的不同方法：乌干达的政策环境最近变得更具包容性，而孟加拉国的政策环境则证明特别具有限制性。我们反思这些案例对人道主义部门未来发展数字身份系统的意义以及对数据正义的影响。
ABSTRACT Around the world, regimes of identification regulate people’s interactions with state and commercial institutions. These regimes promise access to resources and entitlements, while also facilitating people’s visibility to states and therefore their governability. For many, proving one’s identity presents no challenge; however, it is estimated that a billion people have no official proof of identity. Meanwhile, the humanitarian sector is undergoing a transformation in which digital identity, mobile connectivity and digital finance are central features. Through a data justice lens, this paper explores customer identification regimes in two country contexts in which large displaced populations are present: Uganda and Bangladesh. The two cases reveal divergent approaches to regulating refugee identification: while Uganda's policy environment has recently become more inclusive, Bangladesh's proves to be particularly restrictive. We reflect on what these cases mean for the future development of digital identity systems by the humanitarian sector and the implications for data justice.