Book Review: Qualitative Studies of Silence: The Unsaid as Social Action
Book Review: Qualitative Studies of Silence: The Unsaid as Social Action
复制标题
书评：沉默的定性研究：未说出口的社会行动
DOI：
10.1177/1468794120946984
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Jack B. Joyce
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jack B. Joyce
虽然作者没有声称这本书是基于艺术的研究（ABR）的代表，一个有趣的问题可以提出：这本书是ABR的一部分？然而，没有一个简单的答案，因为对ABR的多种解释存在着不同的观点，即艺术还是研究应该是ABR的重点。尽管如此，这本书还是一个很好的例子，说明了可以对学术文本做什么，并且反映了其他学术作品（例如尼克·苏萨尼斯（Nick Sousanis）的《Unflattening》（2015）），以非学术散文的形式呈现了复杂的学术概念。像Pachirat和Sousanis这样的作品让更多的观众可以接触到学术研究，否则他们不会关心它。这本书也是一个重要的除了小说子体裁在定性研究，因此可以作为一个范例，而教学/实践虚构的策略，定性研究人员。
Although the author nowhere claims the book to be a representation of arts-based research (ABR), an interesting question can be posed: is this book a piece of ABR? However, there is no straightforward answer, given multiple interpretations of ABR exist with different views on whether the art or research should be the focus of ABR. Nonetheless, the book is a brilliant example of what can be done to academic texts and is reflective of other academic works (e.g. Unflattening by Nick Sousanis (2015)) presenting complex academic concepts in non-academic prose. Works like Pachirat’s and Sousanis’s are making academic scholarship accessible to a wider audience who otherwise would not be concerned with it. This I think is the major contribution of this play. The book is also an important addition to the fiction sub-genre in qualitative research and thus can be used as an exemplar while teaching/practicing fictional strategies by qualitative researchers.