Justice, Bioethics, and Covid-19.
Justice, Bioethics, and Covid-19.
复制标题
正义、生物伦理学和 Covid-19。
DOI：
10.1002/hast.1300
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Kaebnick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Kaebnick
黑斯廷斯中心报告 2021 年 11 月至 12 月号中的两篇文章都反映了生物伦理学对正义问题，或更广泛地说，对集体利益如何限制个人利益的问题越来越感兴趣。休·德斯蒙德认为，应该根据人类进化领域的发展重新考虑人类增强。他认为，当代对这一领域的理解导致了一种思考增强伦理的新方式——这种方法用群体利益取代个人自主，作为决定哪些增强是可以接受的主要标准。在第二篇文章中，约翰内斯·奈斯考虑了生物伦理学领域利用约翰·罗尔斯的著作来讨论医疗保健获取和健康的社会决定因素的许多尝试，他对罗尔斯的正义理论具有持续的相关性表现出适度乐观的态度。
Both articles in the November-December 2021 issue of the Hastings Center Report reflect bioethics' growing interest in questions of justice, or more generally, questions of how collective interests constrain individual interests. Hugh Desmond argues that human enhancement should be reconsidered in light of developments in the field of human evolution. Contemporary understandings in this area lead, he argues, to a new way of thinking about the ethics of enhancement-an approach that replaces personal autonomy with group benefit as the primary criterion for deciding what enhancements are acceptable. In the second article, Johannes Kniess considers the many attempts within bioethics to draw on John Rawls's work to discuss health care access and social determinants of health, and he comes across as moderately optimistic that Rawls's theory of justice has ongoing relevance.