Geographies of money and finance I
Geographies of money and finance I
复制标题
货币与金融地理学 I
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Leyshon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Leyshon
简而言之，货币在社会科学中被忽视，部分原因是某些方面持续关注静态和有形（生产固定点）。它也被忽视了，因为许多有经济头脑的社会科学家未能以“新国际政治经济学”中开始出现的方式参与政治科学家的相关议程（Strange，1988；Murphy 和 Tooze，1991）。最后，它被左派忽视，因为很少有人“认识到现代全球资本主义体系的主要弱点不在于对劳动力的剥削，也不在于对工人阶级的压迫，而在于其主要政府运行稳定且可行的货币体系以维持全球生产体系的能力”（Strange，1988，第85页）。尽管“据说列宁宣称摧毁资本主义制度的最佳方式是破坏货币”（Keynes，1972，第 57 页），但许多左翼人士仍然受制于盛行的“生产主义”（Corbridge and Thrift，1994：3）。
Money, in short, has been neglected in the social sciences in part because of a continuing focus in some quarters upon the static and the tangible (the fixed points of production). It has also been neglected because of the failure of many economically minded social scientists to engage with the related agendas of political scientists in a way that has begun to happen in the case of the ’new international political economy’ (Strange, 1988; Murphy and Tooze, 1991). Finally, it has been neglected by the Left because few there ’have perceived the main weakness of a modem global capitalist system to lie, not in the exploitation of labour nor in the oppression of the working class, but in the ability of its leading governments to run a monetary system stable and viable enough to sustain a global production system’ (Strange, 1988, p. 85). Although ’Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency’ (Keynes, 1972, p. 57), many on the Left have still remained in thrall to a prevailing ’productionism’ (Corbridge and Thrift, 1994: 3).