Circulating tumor cells in early stage lung adenocarcinoma: a case series report and literature review
Circulating tumor cells in early stage lung adenocarcinoma: a case series report and literature review
复制标题
早期肺腺癌的循环肿瘤细胞:病例系列报告和文献综述。
DOI:
10.18632/oncotarget.15506
复制
发表时间:
2017-04-04
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tan, Qun-You
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jin, Xu-Rui;Zhu, Lu-Yao;Tan, Qun-You
Purpose: The study aimed to monitor circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in early stage lung adenocarcinoma patients.Results: CTCs were characterized and classified to epithelial (E-) CTCs, mesenchymal (M-) CTCs and epithelial-mesenchymal (E&M-) CTCs, as per epithelialmesenchymal transition(EMT) biomarkers. CTCs could not be found in healthy controls. However, in cohort A, CTCs were found in 17 (17/18) cases. Detection rate of E-CTCs was lower (5/18) compared with M-CTC (10/18) or E&M-CTC (14/18). Highly abundant M-CTCs were prone to being in the tumors > 2 cm. In cohorts A and B, CTCs count increased significantly in all patients with tumor progression (7/7). Higher CTCs level or change range could be found postoperatively in the patients with tumor progression, as compared with patients with disease free survival (P < 0.01). Additionally, CTCs detected by CanPatrol (TM) could be validated by CytoploRare or Pep@MNPs.Materials and Methods: We included four cohorts of patients and 20 healthy controls. In cohort A, CTCs were detected by a newly established approach, i.e., CanPatrol (TM), prior to anesthesia and monitored after operation longitudinally. In cohort B, CTCs were not assessed prior to operation, but were longitudinally detected after operation. For validation, we detected FOLR(+)-CTCs by using CytoploRare and EPCAM(+)-CTCs by using Pep@MNPs prior to operation, in cohorts C and D, respectively.Conclusion: CTCs can be detected in early stage lung adenocarcinoma, even in adenocarcinoma in situ, and CTCs detection can effectively monitor tumor progression. The distinguishing of biomarkers of highly invasive and aggressive CTCs warrants further robust study.