Reasons for living versus reasons for dying: examining the internal debate of suicide.
Reasons for living versus reasons for dying: examining the internal debate of suicide.
复制标题
生存的原因与死亡的原因：审视自杀的内部争论。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rachel E. Mann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Jobes;Rachel E. Mann
我们使用 "生存原因与死亡原因（RFL/RFD）评估 "来分别了解有自杀倾向的门诊患者的五大生存原因和死亡原因。49 名有自杀倾向的大学心理咨询中心患者提供了 173 个 RFL 和 145 个 RFD 回答。这些回答被分为 8 个 RFL 编码类别和 9 个 RFD 编码类别。两名接受过 RFL/RFD 编码系统培训的编码员显示出了很高的相互可靠性（KRFL = .81；KRFD = .80）。RFL和RFD编码类别的卡方结果显示，这些编码类别对这些有自杀倾向的患者的显著性并不相同。
The Reasons for Living vs. Reasons for Dying (RFL/RFD) Assessment was used to obtain suicidal outpatients' top five reasons for living and for dying, respectively. Forty-nine suicidal university counseling center patients provided 173 RFL and 145 RFD responses. These responses were organized into eight RFL coding categories and nine RFD coding categories. Two coders trained in the RFL/RFD coding system showed high levels of interrater reliability (KRFL = .81; KRFD = .80). Chi-square results for RFL and RFD coding categories showed that the coding categories were not equally salient to these suicidal patients.