Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012
Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012
复制标题
规划质量评估 1994–2012
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mark R. Stevens
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Lyles;Mark R. Stevens
在过去的20年里，超过45个出版物试图测量和评估计划的质量使用内容分析方法。我们研究的原因，这种增长的文献及其贡献和局限性。我们还研究了这些出版物中描述的研究方法是否符合内容分析方法学文献中的推荐实践，以确定计划质量研究人员是否可能生成可靠和可重复的计划质量数据。我们提供了七项建议计划质量研究人员可以遵循，以解决这些弱点，提高他们的数据的可靠性和可重复性。
During the last twenty years, more than forty-five publications have sought to measure and evaluate the quality of plans using content analysis methods. We examine reasons for this growth in the literature and its contributions and limitations. We also examine whether the research methods described in these publications conform to recommended practices in the methodological literature on content analysis to determine whether plan quality researchers are likely to be generating reliable and reproducible plan quality data. We provide seven recommendations plan quality researchers can follow to address these weaknesses and improve the reliability and reproducibility of their data.