Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action.
Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action.
复制标题
沟通、意义和有组织的行动。
DOI：
10.2307/2392765
复制
发表时间：
1986
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Bougon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Donnellon;B. Gray;M. Bougon
1979年，杰拉尔德·萨兰奇克在伊利诺伊大学尚潘分校商业与工商管理学院的一次学术讨论会上讨论了这一理论。目前关于意义和行动之间关系的两种观点在组织所需的共享意义的数量方面有所不同。我们认为，这两个角度可以整合，如果我们了解沟通的意义和行动的联系。我们提供的经验证据表明，通过沟通，有组织的行动可以发生，尽管组织成员之间的解释的差异。沟通使成员能够创造平等的意义，从而采取有组织的行动。我们的数据揭示了产生和维持等值意义的四种交际机制：隐喻、逻辑论元、情感调节和语言间接。
Gerald Salancik discussed this theory in a colloquium at the College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois, Champaign, in 1979. Two current perspectives on the relationship between meaning and action differ with respect to the amount of shared meaning necessary for organization. We argue that these two perspectives can be integrated if we understand how communication links meaning and action. We provide empirical evidence to show that through communication, organized action can occur despite differences of interpretation among organizational members. Communication enables members to create equifinal meaning, from which organized action can follow. Our data revealed four communication mechanisms that generate and sustain equifinal meaning: metaphor, logical argument, affect modulation, and linguistic indirection.e