Repositioning Ethical Commitments: Participatory Action Research as a Relational Praxis of Social Change
Repositioning Ethical Commitments: Participatory Action Research as a Relational Praxis of Social Change
复制标题
重新定位道德承诺：参与行动研究作为社会变革的关系实践
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Cahill
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Cahill
参与性行动研究的发展反映了一种道德承诺，即为社会变革创造条件，供社区用于自己的目的。但是参与性研究涉及的伦理问题和责任是什么？这些与我们的机构审查委员会（IRB）规定的伦理准则有何不同？在这里，我说明了参与性研究的理由IRB的抽象的道德原则，是有意义的社区，参考一个青年参与性的视频研究项目“平等获得高等教育的所有”，重点是无证学生面临的挑战，试图上大学。我的分析从事这个项目作为一种探索参与式伦理作为一种关系实践的方式，特别是概述了参与式行动研究（PAR）作为一种“关怀伦理”的认识论取向。平等机会项目提出了与我们对风险和责任的概念化有关的关键问题。我认为，参与式研究重新定位我们的理解更广泛的社会政治，我们的日常生活的全球背景下的道德。考虑到这一点，研究人员有集体责任解决代表性，政治策略和情感参与的伦理问题。
The development of participatory action research (PAR) reflects an ethical commitment to creating conditions for social change to be used by the community for their own purposes. But what are the ethical issues and responsibilities involved in participatory research? And how do these differ from the ethical guidelines mandated by our Institutional Review Boards (IRB)? Here I illustrate how participatory research grounds the IRB’s abstract ethical principles in terms that are meaningful to the community, referencing a youth participatory video research project “Equal access to higher education for all “ that focuses on the challenges undocumented students face trying to go to college. My analysis engages this project as a way of exploring participatory ethics as a relational praxis, specifically outlining the epistemological orientation of participatory action research (PAR) as an ‘ethic of care’. The Equal Access project raises critical questions relevant to our conceptualization of risk and responsibility. I argue that participatory research re-positions our understanding of ethics within the broader socio-political, global context of our everyday lives. With this in mind, researchers have a collective responsibility to address ethical questions of representation, political strategy, and emotional engagement.