Beyond coping: The role of supportive relationships and meaning making in youth well-being.
Beyond coping: The role of supportive relationships and meaning making in youth well-being.
复制标题
超越应对：支持性关系和意义创造在青少年福祉中的作用。
DOI：
10.1111/jnu.12901
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Miller,AngelaL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Looman,WendyS;Geiger-Simpson,Elena;Eull,DonnaJ;Lee,Jiwoo;Nersesian,PaulaV;Bell,AdriannaN;Miller,AngelaL
介绍本研究的目的是确定应对策略，资源和优势，预测幸福在一个以社区为基础的样本的青年与不同程度的advertises. Design接地在弹性组合模型，我们使用了混合方法的方法与数据从一个横截面样本的231名青年8- 17岁。材料和方法数据收集使用调查，参与者产生的时间轴活动，简短的采访。措施包括评估应对和评估，弹性资源和资产，主观幸福感和depress.ResultsActive和被动的应对策略预测主观幸福感和抑郁症。控制人口统计学和应对，意义使优势和支持性关系的主观幸福感和较低的抑郁症的显着预测，并减少逆境对这些outcome.DiscussionThe结果的影响，本研究提供支持的弹性组合模型在以社区为基础的样本的青年，与关系的预测主观幸福感和抑郁症的症状。对于这两种结果，家庭关系与积极的幸福感和较低的抑郁症状有最强的关联。与同龄人的支持关系，意义使优势，人际优势，减少被动应对，以及较少的不良生活事件也与更好的outcomes.ConclusionsThese研究结果强调需要评估青年资源和优势，并设计干预措施，针对这些保护因素，为所有青年，临床相关性对预测青年福祉的资源和优势的理论知情理解对于基于优势的信息至关重要。干预儿科研究和实践。弹性组合模型是理解青年福祉预测因素的有用框架。
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to identify coping strategies, resources, and strengths that predict well‐being in a community‐based sample of youth with varying levels of adversity.DesignGrounded in the resilience portfolio model, we used a mixed methods approach with data from a cross‐sectional sample of 231 youth ages 8–17.Materials and MethodsData were collected using a survey, participant‐generated timeline activity, and brief interview. Measures included assessments of coping and appraisal, resilience resources and assets, and subjective well‐being and depression.ResultsActive and passive coping strategies predicted subjective well‐being and depression. Controlling for demographics and coping, meaning making strengths and supportive relationships were significant predictors of subjective well‐being and lower depression, and decreased the impact of adversity on these outcomes.DiscussionThe results of this study provide support for the resilience portfolio model in a community‐based sample of youth, with relationships as predicted for subjective well‐being and symptoms of depression. For both outcomes, family relationships held the strongest associations with positive well‐being and lower symptoms of depression. Supportive relationships with peers, meaning making strengths, interpersonal strengths, less passive coping, and fewer adverse life events were also associated with better outcomes.ConclusionsThese findings underscore the need to assess youth resources and strengths and to design interventions that target these protective factors for all youth, regardless of exposure to adversity.Clinical RelevanceA theory‐informed understanding of resources and strengths that predict youth well‐being is essential to inform strengths‐based interventions for pediatric research and practice. The resilience portfolio model is a useful framework for understanding predictors of youth well‐being.