Early Changes in Kidney Distribution under the New Allocation System

Early Changes in Kidney Distribution under the New Allocation System
复制标题

DOI:
10.1681/asn.2015080934
复制
发表时间:
2016-08-01
影响因子:
13.6
通讯作者:
Segev, Dorry L.
Segev, Dorry L.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Massie, Allan B.;Luo, Xun;Segev, Dorry L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

肾脏分配系统(KAS)是对已故捐赠者肾脏分配的重大改变,于2014年12月实施。KAS的目标包括将最高质量的器官提供给更年轻/更健康的受者,并为高度敏感的患者和种族/少数民族提供更多的死亡供体肾移植(DDKT)。使用国家登记数据,我们比较了2013年1月1日至2014年12月3日(KAS前)与2014年12月4日至2015年8月31日(KAS后)之间的肾脏分布,等待登记者的DDKT率和受体特征。区域进口从KAS前的8.8%增加到KAS后的12.5%;国家进口从KAS前的12.7%增加到KAS后的19.1%(P <0.001)。年龄大于30岁的受者比例从19.4%下降到15.0%(P <0.001)。计算的群体反应性抗体= 100的受者比例从1.0%增加到10.3%(P <0.001)。总体DDKT率没有变化,如使用指数回归调整候选特征所建模的(P = 0.07)。然而,DDKT率(发生率比,95%置信区间)黑人增加(1.19; 1.13至1.25)和西班牙裔(1.13; 1.05至1.20)候选人和18至40岁的候选人(1.47; 1.38至1.57),但50岁以上的候选人下降(0.93; 51 - 60岁的候选人为0.87至0.98,70岁以上的候选人为0.90; 0.85至0.96)。移植受者移植肾功能延迟恢复率从KAS前的24.8%增加到KAS后的29.9%(P <0.001)。因此,在KAS的前9个月,少数民族、年轻候选人和高度敏感患者获得DDKT的机会有所改善,但老年候选人的机会有所下降。移植物功能延迟显著增加,可能提示长期结局较差。
The Kidney Allocation System (KAS), a major change to deceased donor kidney allocation, was implemented in December 2014. Goals of KAS included directing the highest-quality organs to younger/healthier recipients and increasing access to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) for highly sensitized patients and racial/ethnic minorities. Using national registry data, we compared kidney distribution, DDKT rates for waitlist registrants, and recipient characteristics between January 1, 2013, and December 3, 2014 (pre-KAS) with those between December 4, 2014, and August 31, 2015 (post-KAS). Regional imports increased from 8.8% pre-KAS to 12.5% post-KAS; national imports increased from 12.7% pre-KAS to 19.1% post-KAS (P < 0.001). The proportion of recipients >30 years older than their donor decreased from 19.4% to 15.0% (P < 0.001). The proportion of recipients with calculated panel-reactive antibody =100 increased from 1.0% to 10.3% (P < 0.001). Overall DDKT rate did not change as modeled using exponential regression adjusting for candidate characteristics (P=0.07). However, DDKT rate (incidence rate ratio, 95% confidence interval) increased for black (1.19; 1.13 to 1.25) and Hispanic (1.13; 1.05 to 1.20) candidates and for candidates aged 18-40 (1.47; 1.38 to 1.57), but declined for candidates aged >50 (0.93; 0.87 to 0.98 for aged 51-60 and 0.90; 0.85 to 0.96 for aged >70). Delayed graft function in transplant recipients increased from 24.8% pre-KAS to 29.9% post-KAS (P < 0.001). Thus, in the first 9 months under KAS, access to DDKT improved for minorities, younger candidates, and highly sensitized patients, but declined for older candidates. Delayed graft function increased substantially, possibly suggesting poorer long-term outcomes.