The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men

The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/ejsp.284
复制
发表时间:
2005-11-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Siebler, F
Siebler, F
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bohner, G;Jarvis, CI;Siebler, F

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

男性对强奸迷思的接受度(RMA)的暂时可及性增加了RMA和强奸倾向(RP)之间的相关性,表明RMA对RP的因果影响(G。Bohner等人,1998年)。我们还研究了以前的性胁迫作为长期访问RMA的指标。在研究1(N = 107)中,RMA和RP之间的相关性更高:(a)如果RMA在RP之前(与之后)进行评估;(B)与没有进行过性胁迫的男性相比,先前进行过性胁迫的男性。在研究2(N = 148)中,性胁迫的男性比非胁迫的男性更快地回答RMA项目。两者合计,这些研究结果表明,临时和长期的访问RMA独立影响RMA RP链接。版权所有(c)2005年约翰威利父子有限公司。
Heightened temporary accessibility of men's rape myth acceptance (RMA) increases the correlation between RMA and rape proclivity (RP), suggesting a causal impact of RMA on RP (G. Bohner et al., 1998). We additionally examined previous sexual coercion as an indicator of chronic accessibility of RMA. In Study 1 (N = 107), the correlation between RMA and RP was higher: (a) if RMA was assessed before (versus after) RP; and (b) for men who had previously engaged in sexual coercion compared with men who had not. In Study 2 (N = 148), sexually coercive men were faster answering RMA items than were noncoercive men. Taken together, these findings indicate that the temporary and chronic accessibility of RMA independently affect the RMA-RP link. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.