The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men
The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/ejsp.284
复制
发表时间:
2005-11-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Siebler, F
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bohner, G;Jarvis, CI;Siebler, F
Heightened temporary accessibility of men's rape myth acceptance (RMA) increases the correlation between RMA and rape proclivity (RP), suggesting a causal impact of RMA on RP (G. Bohner et al., 1998). We additionally examined previous sexual coercion as an indicator of chronic accessibility of RMA. In Study 1 (N = 107), the correlation between RMA and RP was higher: (a) if RMA was assessed before (versus after) RP; and (b) for men who had previously engaged in sexual coercion compared with men who had not. In Study 2 (N = 148), sexually coercive men were faster answering RMA items than were noncoercive men. Taken together, these findings indicate that the temporary and chronic accessibility of RMA independently affect the RMA-RP link. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.