A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration
A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration
复制标题
海洋二氧化碳去除和封存的研究策略
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Veneman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tjitske Berends;S. Boerma;J. Doornebal;B. Dikkeschei;C. Stegeman;T. Veneman
As of 2021, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels have reached historically unprecedented levels, higher than at any time in the past 800,000 years. The increase in CO2 emissions from human activities such as fossil fuel burning, agriculture, and historical land-use change greatly exceeds the ability of nature to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Worldwide efforts to reduce emissions by creating a more efficient, carbon-free energy system may not be enough to stabilize the climate and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Carbon dioxide removal (CDR), sometimes referred to as negative emissions technologies, likely will be needed to meet the global goal of limiting warming to well below 2° degrees C, compared to pre-industrial levels, as established by the Paris Agreement. In 2019, the National Academies published a report that laid out a research agenda for advancing a variety of landand coastal-based CDR approaches and specifically, for assessing their benefits, risks, and sustainable scale potential. The study found that, to meet climate goals, some form of CDR will likely be needed to remove roughly 10Gt CO2/yr by mid-century and 20Gt CO2/yr by the end of the century. To help meet that goal, the report identified four land-based CDR approaches ready for large-scale deployment: afforestation/reforestation, changes in forest management, uptake and storage by agricultural soils, and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, based on thepotential to remove carbon at costs below $100/t of CO2. This report builds on the 2019 report to assess what is currently known about the benefits, risks, and potential for responsible scale-up of six specific oceanbased CDR strategies that include both ecological and technological concepts as identified by the sponsor, ClimateWorks Foundation. It describes the research needed to advance understanding of those approaches and address knowledge gaps. The resulting research agenda is meant to provide an improved and unbiased knowledge base for the public, stakeholders, and policymakers to make informed decisions on the next steps for ocean CDR, as part of a larger climate mitigation strategy; it is not meant to lock in or advocate for any particular approach.