United Nations: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
United Nations: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
复制标题
联合国：《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》
DOI：
10.1017/s0020782900043448
复制
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Meier
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Meier
可以指出的是，仍然缺少一个全面的、对各级政策措施采取一般性做法的办法。这些仍然是有选择地采取的，并取决于各自的部门。尽管确立了将性别观点纳入主流的做法，但仍不清楚的是，在制定法律之前，是否对法律进行了审查，以考虑可能对妇女产生的负面影响，以及是否征求了妇女和人权问题专家的意见。2在奥地利政府内设立妇女事务部长办公室2民间社会中的妇女利益团体（例如奥地利妇女协会和组织的伞式组织）没有正式参与立法进程。事实上，妇女权利专家对法案发表评论的可能性往往由于审查期很短和法案文本很长而受到损害。关于缺乏从妇女角度分析2012年“一揽子巩固计划”的批评，另见：Schratzenstaller，Margit（2012）：“Gendergerechtes Sparbudget”，《标准报》，2012年3月17日
It can be noted that a comprehensive general approach of policy measures on all levels is still missing. These continue to be taken selectively and depend on the respective department. Despite the establishment of gender mainstreaming it remains unclear if laws are examined with a view to possible negative consequences for women before they are legislated and if experts on women’s and human rights are asked for their opinion. 2 The establishment of the office of a Minister for Women within the Austrian government is 2 Women’s interest groups in civil society (for example the umbrella organisation of women’s associations and organisations in Austria) are not formally involved in the legislative process. The possibility of women’s rights experts to comment on bills is de facto often undermined by a very short review period and the long texts of the bills. For criticism concerning the lack of an analysis of the “consolidation package” for 2012 from a woman’s perspective also see: Schratzenstaller, Margit (2012): “Gendergerechtes Sparbudget”, Newspaper Der Standard, 17 March, 2012