Reclaiming the Commons
Reclaiming the Commons
复制标题
夺回公地
DOI：
10.31235/osf.io/ruwbp
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nate Ela
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nate Ela
城市农业已经被社会科学家，甚至一些城市种植者作为一种开垦公地的手段进行了理论化。但“收回公地”意味着什么呢？一份Long-Durée家谱揭示了对公地的独特社会法律想象，以及对如何重新利用公地的愿景。社会思想家和改革者在如何解决骆家辉指出的私有财产的关键问题上存在分歧：没有土地的人找不到有报酬的工作。托马斯·杰斐逊提出的一个愿景是，通过激活空间来重新利用公地--让失业者与未使用的土地重新结合起来。托马斯·潘恩提出的另一种观点认为，这种联合是不可行的；它将通过对财产征税并转移收益来收回公地。谱系学分析有助于理解当代都市农业，认为它符合杰斐逊式的土地固定模式，即开垦公地，而不是国家主导的解决失业和贫困的税收固定战略。
Urban agriculture has been theorized by social scientists, and even some urban growers, as a means of reclaiming the commons. But what does “reclaiming the commons” entail? A longue-durée genealogy reveals distinct socio-legal imaginations of the commons and visions of how it might be reclaimed. Social thinkers and reformers have split over how to address the key problem of private property identified by John Locke: landless people who can’t find paid employment. One vision, proposed by Thomas Jefferson, would reclaim the commons by activating space – reuniting the unemployed with unused land. Another, proposed by Thomas Paine, takes such a reunion as impracticable; it would reclaim the commons by taxing property and transferring the proceeds. The genealogical analysis helps understand contemporary urban agriculture as consistent with a Jeffersonian “land fix” mode of reclaiming the commons, and by contrast to state-led “tax fix” strategies for addressing unemployment and poverty.