Privatizing the ground water resource: individual use and alternative specifications

Privatizing the ground water resource: individual use and alternative specifications
复制标题

地下水资源私有化:个人使用和替代规范

DOI:
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1988.tb02999.x
复制
发表时间:
1988
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
David T. Fractor
David T. Fractor
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
David T. Fractor

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

:虽然大多数有关提高地下水分配效率的调查都集中在涉及集中管理的各种方案上,但最近的重点已转向探索私人财产解决这些问题的方法。然而,在模拟地下水使用时,这些研究中的大多数都将私有财产下的行为等同于公共财产条件下的行为。这可能会导致一个错误的结论,即私有产权不会促进更有效地利用地下水,因为这些模型假设生产者忽略了当前抽水的未来影响。本文试图通过正式模拟共同财产、中央管理和私有财产情景下的地下水利用来纠正这一不足。此外,对地下水产权的界定有很多种方式,其中一些方式确立了对资源的排他性。本文分析了四种产权规格对配置效率的可能影响:全股流、部分股流、有限股流和纯股流权利。
: While most inquiries into improving the efficiency of ground water allocation have focused upon various schemes involving centralized management, recently the focus has shifted towards exploring private property solutions to these problems. However, most of these studies, when modeling ground water use, have equated behavior under private property to that under common property conditions. This leads to the possibly mistaken conclusion that private property rights do not promote more efficient ground water use, because these models assume that producers ignore the future effects of current pumping. This paper attempts to correct this deficiency by formally modeling ground water use under common property, central management, and private property scenarios. Moreover, there are many ways that property rights can be defined over ground water, some establishing more exclusivity over the resource than others. Four specifications of property rights are analyzed for their likely effects on allocative efficiency: full stock-flow, partial stock-flow, limited stock-flow, and pure flow rights.