Apocryphon of Ezekiel Fragment 3: Meaning and Reception
Apocryphon of Ezekiel Fragment 3: Meaning and Reception
复制标题
以西结残卷 3 的伪经：意义和接受
DOI：
10.1163/9789004357211_015
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christfried Böttrich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christfried Böttrich
有五个片段被古代作家认为是以西结写的，但它们并没有出现在以西结的正典中。1因为其中一个片段被明确地说来自以西结的伪经（Epiphanius, Pan. 64.70）。5)， 2这是一个似是而非的假设，即所有五部作品都出自同一部作品，特别是因为《尼西弗鲁斯的计量学》也证明了一本伪经书的存在，这本书被认为是以西结的作品。为了避免不必要地增加假设的作品，除非有充分的理由不这样认为，否则我们可能应该假设所有的作品都来自同一个丢失的伪经。这是否也是约瑟夫提到的以西结书的第二本书（Ant. 10.79），以及它是否与希伯来语碎片在死海古卷（4QPseudo-Ezekiel）中幸存下来的伪以西结书是同一部作品，我们不需要在当前上下文中讨论。现在通常被称为片段33的片段（可能是最原始的版本）如下：“母牛已经生产了，还没有生产”（ο δ <s:2> μαλις τ α）。它被引用在五部基督教著作中：《彼得行传》第24章，德尔图良，德·卡尼·克里斯蒂第23章，亚历山大的克莱门特，
There are five fragments that are attributed by ancient writers to Ezekiel but which do not occur in the canonical book of Ezekiel. 1 Since one of these fragments is explicitly said to derive from an apocryphon of Ezekiel (Epiphanius, Pan. 64.70. 5), 2 it is a plausible hypothesis that all five derive from this same work, especially since the Stichometry of Nicephorus also attests the existence of a pseudepigraphal work attributed to Ezekiel. In the interests of not multiplying hypothetical works unnecessarily, we should probably assume that all derive from the same lost apocryphon unless there is good reason to think otherwise. Whether this was also the second book of Ezekiel to which Josephus referred (Ant. 10.79) and whether it was the same work as the apocryphal Ezekiel of which fragments in Hebrew survive among the Dead Sea Scrolls (4QPseudo-Ezekiel) we need not discuss in the present context. The fragment which is now generally known as Fragment 33 reads (in what is probably the most original version):“The heifer has given birth and has not given birth”(ἡ δάμαλις τέτοκεν καὶ οὐ τέτοκεν). 4 It is quoted in five Christian works: Acts of Peter 24, Tertullian, De Carne Christi 23, Clement of Alexandria,