Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process‐based hydrologic models
Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process‐based hydrologic models
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/2015wr017910
复制
发表时间：
2016-03
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
M. Clark;B. Schaefli;S. Schymanski;L. Samaniego;C. Luce;B. Jackson;J. Freer;J. Arnold;R. Moore-R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Clark;B. Schaefli;S. Schymanski;L. Samaniego;C. Luce;B. Jackson;J. Freer;J. Arnold;R. Moore-R.
在这篇评论中，我们认为，通过更好地利用现有的水文理论，可以改善水文模型的物理现实性。我们解决以下问题：（1）当前水文理论的一些关键要素是什么？（2）如何最好地将这些要素纳入当前模型中可能缺失的地方？（3）我们如何评估跨尺度和位置的竞争水文理论？我们建议，水文科学将受益于一个基于模型的社区综合努力，重新构建，整合和评估水文行为的不同解释，并提供一个可控的途径，找到理解福尔斯不足。
In this Commentary, we argue that it is possible to improve the physical realism of hydrologic models by making better use of existing hydrologic theory. We address the following questions: (1) what are some key elements of current hydrologic theory; (2) how can those elements best be incorporated where they may be missing in current models; and (3) how can we evaluate competing hydrologic theories across scales and locations? We propose that hydrologic science would benefit from a model‐based community synthesis effort to reframe, integrate, and evaluate different explanations of hydrologic behavior, and provide a controlled avenue to find where understanding falls short.