Validity and Reproducibility of Motion Sensors in Youth: A Systematic Update
Validity and Reproducibility of Motion Sensors in Youth: A Systematic Update
复制标题
DOI：
10.1249/mss.0b013e31818e5819
复制
发表时间：
2009-04-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Van Mechelen, Willem
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Vries, Sanne I.;Van Hirtum, Helmi W. J. E. M.;Van Mechelen, Willem
德弗里斯一、W. J. E. M.货车希尔图姆岛贝克，M.新罕布什尔州霍普曼岩HIRASING和W.货车麦克伦。青年运动传感器的有效性和再现性：系统更新。医学科学斑点练习，Vol. 41，No. 4，pp. 818-827，2009年。目的：回顾最近发表的关于运动传感器用于评估健康儿童和青少年（2-18岁）体力活动的可重复性、有效性和可行性的研究。方法：2004年10月，在PubMed、EMBASE和PsycINFO中进行了系统的文献检索。该检索已于2007年10月更新。在本次更新中，使用检查表对三种计步器（Digi-Walker、Walk 4Life和Sun TrekLINQ）和九种加速度计（ActiGraph、BioTrainer、StepWatch活动监测器、Actiwatch、Actical、Tritrac-R3 D、RT 3、ActivTracer和Mini-Motionlogger）的临床质量进行了评估和比较。结果如下：回顾了32项最近发表的临床研究，所有12种运动传感器都已在一项或多项研究中在青少年中得到验证。有强有力的证据表明StepWatch在儿童和青少年（4-18岁）中的有效性为中等，ActiGraph在学龄前儿童和幼儿（2-8岁）中的有效性为中等至良好。12个运动传感器的可重复性和可行性的证据较少。有强有力的证据表明ActiGraph在学龄前儿童（2-4岁）中具有良好的再现性。结论：与2004年进行的审查相比，有更多的证据表明，青少年的计步器和加速度计的临床质量。大多数运动传感器在评估青少年的身体活动方面似乎是可重复的，有效的和可行的。
DE VRIES, S. I., W. J. E. M. VAN HIRTUM, I. BEKKER, M. HOPMAN-ROCK, R.A. HIRASING, and W. VAN MECHELLEN. Validity and Reproducibility of Motion Sensors in Youth: A Systematic Update. Med. Sci. Spots Exerc., Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 818-827, 2009. Purpose: To review recently published studies on the reproducibility, validity, and feasibility of motion sensors used to assess physical activity in healthy children and adolescents (2-18 yr). Methods: On October 2004, a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was performed. This search has been updated on October 2007. In this update, the clinimetric quality of three pedometers (Digi-Walker, Walk4Life, and Sun TrekLINQ) and nine accelerometers (ActiGraph, BioTrainer, StepWatch Activity Monitor, Actiwatch, Actical, Tritrac-R3D, RT3, ActivTracer, and Mini-Motionlogger) has been evaluated and compared using a checklist. Results: Thirty-two recently published clinimetric studies have been reviewed, All 12 motion sensors have been validated in youth in one or more studies. There is strong evidence for moderate validity of the StepWatch in children and adolescents (4-18 yr) and moderate to good validity of the ActiGraph in preschool children and young children (2-8 yr). There is less evidence for the reproducibility and feasibility of the 12 motion sensors. Strong evidence exists for good reproducibility of the ActiGraph in preschool children (2-4 yr). Conclusion: Compared to the review performed in 2004, there is increased evidence for the clinimetric quality of pedometers and accelerometers in youth. Most motion sensors seem reproducible, valid, and feasible in assessing physical activity in youth.