Resilience in perinatal HIV+ adolescents in South Africa.

Resilience in perinatal HIV+ adolescents in South Africa.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/09540121.2016.1176676
复制
发表时间:
2016-03
期刊:
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
McKay M
McKay M
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bhana A;Mellins CA;Small L;Nestadt DF;Leu CS;Petersen I;Machanyangwa S;McKay M

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

越来越多的围产期感染艾滋病毒(PHIV+)的青年能够更好地获得治疗,存活到成年。然而,很少有研究检验艾滋病毒阳性青年在面对逆境(恢复力)时的积极结果。社会行动理论(SAT)为南非hiv阳性青年的研究提供了理论框架,允许检查影响行为健康的环境、社会和自我调节因素。数据来自青少年和照顾者基线访谈,简单地汇总了VUKA家庭项目的试点(N=66)和更大(N= 111)随机对照试验(RCT)。在这项分析中,结果包括情绪和行为功能(总困难)和亲社会行为。潜在的SAT相关因素包括社会人口统计学;照料者健康和心理健康;亲子关系因素;污名,儿童应对,支持;和自尊。调整了年龄、性别和研究的回归分析显示,在情境、社会和自我调节水平上存在显著关联。较低的儿童总困难得分与较低的照顾者抑郁(β = 3.906,p < .001)、较少的照顾者报告的关于困难问题的沟通(β = 1.882, p = .009)和较高的青少年自尊(β = -0.119, p = .020)相关。更大的亲社会行为与更多的照顾者报告的沟通(β = 0.722, p = 0.020)和儿童使用一厢情愿的应对方式(β = 5.532, p = 0.009)相关。较少的青少年抑郁与较高的照顾者教育(β = - 0.399, p = 0.010)、较高的照顾者监督(β = - 1.261, p = 0.012)、更多的社会支持寻求(β = - 0.453, p = 0.002)、较高的青少年自尊(β = - 0.067, p < 0.001)、较低的内化污名(β = 0.608, p = 0.040)和儿童使用辞职应对(β = 1.152, p = 0.041)相关。我们的数据支持以证据为基础的家庭干预措施,这些干预措施也能促进青少年的自我调节技能,从而增强艾滋病毒阳性青少年的健康和心理健康。
Increasing numbers of perinatally HIV (PHIV+)-infected youth are surviving into adulthood with better access to treatment. However, few studies examine positive outcomes in the face of adversity (resilience) for PHIV+ youth. Social Action Theory (SAT) provided the theoretical framework for this study of PHIV + youth in South Africa (SA), allowing examination of contextual, social, and self-regulatory factors that influence behavioral health. Data were from youth and caregiver baseline interviews, simply pooled from a pilot (N=66) and larger (n=111) randomized control trial (RCT) of the VUKA Family program. For this analysis, outcomes included emotional and behavioral functioning (total difficulties), and prosocial behaviors. Potential SAT correlates included socio-demographics; caregiver health and mental health; parent-child relationship factors; stigma, and child coping, support; and self-esteem. Regression analyses adjusted for age, gender, and study revealed significant associations at the contextual, social, and self-regulation level. Lower total child difficulties scores were associated with lower caregiver depression (β = 3.906,p < .001), less caregiver-reported communication about difficult issues (β = 1.882, p = .009) and higher youth self-esteem (β = -0.119, p = .020). Greater prosocial behaviors were associated with greater caregiver-reported communication (β = 0.722, p = .020) and child use of wishful thinking for coping (β = 5.532, p = .009). Less youth depression was associated with higher caregiver education (β =−0.399, p = .010), greater caregiver supervision (β = −1.261, p = .012), more social support seeking (β = −0.453, p = .002), higher youth self-esteem (β = −0.067, p < .001), lower internalized stigma (β = 0.608, p = .040), and child use of resignation for coping (β = 1.152, p = .041). Our data support evidence-based family interventions that also promote youth self-regulation skills to enhance the health and mental health of PHIV+ youth.