Individualised or Standardised Outcome Measures: A Co-habitation?
Individualised or Standardised Outcome Measures: A Co-habitation?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10488-019-00928-z
复制
发表时间：
2019-07-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Kordowicz, Maria
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ashworth, Mark;Guerra, Daniel;Kordowicz, Maria
心理健康结果测量在两种不同的思想流派之间存在冲突，这两种流派是标准化（规范）测量和个体化或患者生成（具体）测量之间的划分的基础。就我们如何理解世界而言，两种方法的基础哲学有着截然不同的出发点。然而，两者的优势可能会给患者和心理健康服务带来一些有用的东西。我们建议将各种方法与同居选择的新思维结合起来。
Mental health outcome measurement is conflicted between two different schools of thought which underlie the division between standardised (nomothetic) and individualised or patient-generated (idiographic) measures. The underpinning philosophies of both approaches have very different starting points in terms of how we understand the world. And yet the strengths of both may contribute something useful for patients and mental health services. We suggest a convergence of approaches with new thinking on options for co-habitation.