Degree of correspondence between daily monitoring and retrospective recall of alcohol use among men and women with comorbid AUD and PTSD.
Degree of correspondence between daily monitoring and retrospective recall of alcohol use among men and women with comorbid AUD and PTSD.
复制标题
患有 AUD 和 PTSD 共病的男性和女性饮酒情况的日常监测和回顾性回忆之间的对应程度。
DOI：
10.1111/ajad.12342
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Simpson,TracyL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Krenek,Marketa;Lyons,Robert;Simpson,TracyL
背景和目的大多数研究已经确定了每日监测和回顾性回忆酒精使用之间的良好对应关系，这些研究包括相对稳定、适度饮酒、报告戒酒和未诊断为共病的参与者。目前的研究检查酒精使用之间的对应程度，每天通过交互式语音应答（IVR）电话监测报告，并回顾性地使用缩写形式-90（形式-35）涵盖相同的35天时间periodsMethodsParticipants是54名男性和女性共病酒精依赖和创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）谁报告饮酒的时间period.ResultsResults结果表明，参与者通过IVR报告更多的饮酒天数。总体水平酒精使用变量的报告方法之间的对应性很强，包括存在/不存在饮酒日和大量饮酒日以及标准饮酒，并且在接近饮酒日和大量饮酒日的评估日期的几周内，相关性增加。饮酒日和重度饮酒日的每日一致性为中度，尽管报告方法之间的对应性存在较大的人与人之间的差异。事后分析表明，男性和参与者谁喝更多的往往有较低的对应关系之间的评估methods.Discussion和ConclusionsOverall，调查结果部分复制了以前的研究，并扩展了我们的知识，酒精评估的共病sample.Scientific SignificanceFindings强调考虑的重要性，调节变量对报告的酒精使用。(Am J Addict 2016;25：145-151）
Background and ObjectivesThe majority of studies that have identified good correspondence between daily monitoring and retrospective recall of alcohol use have included participants who are relatively stable, are moderate drinkers, report abstinence, and are not diagnosed with comorbid disorders. The current study examined degree of correspondence between alcohol use that was reported daily via interactive voice response (IVR) telephone monitoring and retrospectively using an abbreviated Form‐90 (Form‐35) covering the same 35‐day time period.MethodsParticipants were 54 men and women with comorbid alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who reported drinking during the time period.ResultsResults indicated that participants reported more drinking days via IVR. Correspondence was strong between the reporting methods for aggregate‐level alcohol use variables, including presence/absence of drinking days and heavy drinking days and standard drinks, and associations increased for weeks closer to the assessment date for drinking days and heavy drinking days. Day‐to‐day agreement was moderate for drinking days and heavy drinking days, though there was large between‐person variability in correspondence between reporting methods. Post‐hoc analyzes suggested that men and participants who drink more tend to have lower correspondence between assessment methods.Discussion and ConclusionsOverall, findings partially replicated previous research and extend our knowledge of alcohol assessment in a comorbid sample.Scientific SignificanceFindings highlight the importance of considering the influence that moderating variables have on reporting of alcohol use. (Am J Addict 2016;25:145–151)