Fang Fang

Fang Fang
复制标题

方方

DOI:
10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.042
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
9.2
通讯作者:
Fang Fang
Fang Fang
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fang Fang

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

马尔,你可能已经从我对第一个问题的回答中猜到了。第二个英雄是柯南道尔小说中的福尔摩斯!我对他敏锐的逻辑推理和他从别人认为的次要细节中得出重要结论的能力印象深刻。我倾向于认为,优秀的科学家,尤其是认知神经科学家,应该拥有和福尔摩斯一样的伟大能力。人类认知神经科学家(和视觉科学家)无法直接测量大脑内部的神经活动。他们不得不依靠脑成像技术和心理物理学的间接测量,然后对大脑和心灵中发生的事情做出推断。
Marr, as you have probably guessed from my answer to the first question. A second hero is Sherlock Holmes, from Conan Doyle’s fiction! I am extremely impressed by his astute logical reasoning and his ability to draw important conclusions from what others consider minor details. I tend to believe that excellent scientists, especially cognitive neuroscientists, should have the same great capabilities as Holmes. Human cognitive neuroscientists (and vision scientists) cannot directly measure neural activities inside the brain. They have to rely on indirect measurements with brain-imaging techniques and psychophysics, and then make inferences about what is going on in the brain and the mind.