National Norms for the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale in Children
National Norms for the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale in Children
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/jpepsy/jsab132
复制
发表时间：
2022-06-07
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Lindhiem, Oliver
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anderson, Nathan P.;Feldman, Jamie A.;Lindhiem, Oliver
目的为范德比尔特注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）诊断父母评定量表（VADPRS）的研究和临床评分提供美国5-12岁儿童的全国常模和标准。方法VADPRS的5个临床分量表由美国5-12岁儿童的1,570名照顾者完成，儿童代表全国人口的关键人口统计学变量，包括种族，性别，民族，家庭收入和家庭教育水平。为该清单的五个临床子量表中的每一个提供了描述性统计量和维度和症状计数评分的内部一致性测量，以及基于年龄和儿童性别的选择维度评分子量表的样本和组比较。结果使用VADPRS的两种评分方式，每个分量表的内部一致性措施从高到可接受的范围。对于总样本，年龄（ADHD多动，焦虑/抑郁）和性别（ADHD，对立违抗性障碍（ODD）的两种表现）的不同分量表之间存在统计学显著差异。然而，这些差异的幅度不大，不太可能具有临床意义。结论本研究为VADPRS的各个分量表提供了全国性的常模和评分标准，提高了VADPRS的研究和临床应用价值。样本中年龄和性别之间的差异在两个子量表（多动和焦虑/抑郁）中具有统计学显著性，其他子量表仅在性别方面具有显著性（注意力不集中和ODD），但这些差异不足以表明需要单独的筛选截止值。
Objective To provide national norms and percentiles for both research and clinical scoring modalities of the Vanderbilt Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS) for a representative sample of children ages 5-12 in the United States. Method The five clinical subscales of the VADPRS were completed by 1,570 caregivers of children ages 5-12 in the United States, with children representative of the national population on key demographic variables including race, sex, ethnicity, family income, and family educational level. Descriptive statistics and measures of internal consistency of both dimensional and symptom count scoring were provided for each of the five clinical subscales of the inventory, as well as percentiles and group comparisons for select dimensional scoring subscales based on age and child sex. Results Measures of internal consistency for each subscale using both scoring modalities of the VADPRS ranged from high to acceptable. There were statistically significant differences among the different subscales for both age (ADHD hyperactivity, anxiety/depression) and sex [both presentations of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)] for the total sample. These differences, however, were modest in magnitude and unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Conclusions This study enhances the research and clinical utility of the VADPRS by providing national norms and percentiles for each of its subscales. Differences between age and sex across the sample were statistically significant for two of the subscales (Hyperactivity and Anxiety/Depression) with additional subscales significant for sex alone (Inattentive and ODD), but these differences were not substantial enough to indicate a need for separate cut-offs for screening purposes.