Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting
Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting
复制标题
哈贝马斯在实验室：实验环境中的商议研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Adam F. Simon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Sulkin;Adam F. Simon
本研究概述了研究审议对政治决策影响的新范式。具体来说，它使用最后通牒博弈作为一种情况，在这种情况下，深思熟虑的机会和这个机会的放置是通过实验操纵的。结构性因素，例如参与者的角色以及他们对所提供提案进行投票的能力，也被操纵作为比较的基础。研究了两个结果：游戏的分配和玩家对公平性的看法。在控制结构性因素后，深思熟虑的机会创造了更公平的资金分配并增强了公平感。然而，只有当这样的机会出现在提案阶段之前时，这些结果才成立。提案阶段后的审议机会没有明显的影响。一项对参与者的调查发现，他们的个人特征和政治倾向会影响提议者对公平性的看法，但不会影响接受者。这些发现证明了深思熟虑的潜在好处，同时强调了其实施性质在决定其成功程度方面的重要性。
This study outlines a new paradigm for the investigation of the effects of deliberation on political decisions. Specifically, it uses the ultimatum game as a situation in which the opportunity to deliberate and the placement of this opportunity are experimentally manipulated. Structural factors, such as the players' roles and their ability to vote on the proposal being offered, are also manipulated as a basis for comparison. Two outcomes are examined: the games' allocations, and players' perceptions of fairness. After controlling for structural factors, deliberative opportunity creates a more equitable distribution of money and enhances fairness perceptions. However, these results hold only when such an opportunity occurs before the proposal stage. Deliberative opportunity after the proposal stage has no discernible impact. A survey of participants found that their personal characteristics and political predispositions influence perceptions offairnessfor proposers, but notfor acceptors. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits ofdeliberation while highlighting the importance of the nature of its implementation in determining its level of success.