Type A score (Jenkins Activity Survey) and risk of recurrent coronary heart disease in the aspirin myocardial infarction study.

Type A score (Jenkins Activity Survey) and risk of recurrent coronary heart disease in the aspirin myocardial infarction study.
复制标题

阿司匹林心肌梗塞研究中的 A 型评分(詹金斯活动调查)和复发冠心病的风险。

DOI:
10.1016/0002-9149(85)90838-0
复制
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
The American journal of cardiology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Marija Norusis
Marija Norusis
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Shekelle;R. Shekelle;M. Gale;M. Gale;Marija Norusis;Marija Norusis

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Jenkins活动调查(JAS)是一份评估a型行为模式的问卷,在阿司匹林心肌梗死研究中对2314名参与者进行了调查。所有人在进入研究前都有心肌梗死(MI),随访时间至少为3年。在244名女性、2070名男性或671名全职从事专业、技术或管理职位的男性的亚组中,JAS A型评分与主要冠状动脉事件(明确的非致死性心肌梗死和冠状动脉死亡)复发的风险无显著相关。这些结果表明,JAS A型评分不能用于评估心肌梗死后的预后。由此推断,由JAS A型评分测量的特征,如竞争力、追求成就的取向和对快节奏生活的偏好,似乎与主要冠状动脉事件复发的风险增加无关。
The Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS), a questionnaire developed to assess the type A behavior pattern, was administered to 2,314 participants in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study. All had a myocardial infarction (MI) before entering the study and were followed for at least 3 years. The JAS type A score was not significantly related to risk of recurrent major coronary events (definite nonfatal MI and coronary death) in the group of 244 women, the group of 2,070 men, or the subgroup of 671 men who were employed full-time in professional, technical or managerial positions. These results indicate that the JAS type A score is not useful in assessing prognosis after MI. By inference, traits measured by the JAS type A score, such as competitiveness, orientation toward achievement and preference for a rapid pace of life, appear not to be associated with increased risk of recurrent major coronary events.