Annotation and Classification of Argumentative Writing Revisions

Annotation and Classification of Argumentative Writing Revisions
复制标题

议论文修订的注释和分类

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
BEA@NAACL-HLT
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Litman
D. Litman
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fan Zhang;D. Litman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文对议论文写作中学生修改行为的标注和分类进行了探讨。提出了一个句子级的复习图式,以捕捉学生为什么和如何进行复习。基于提出的模式,一个小的学生论文和修订的语料库被注释。研究表明,人工标注的模式是可靠的,标注的信息有助于修订分析。在此基础上,探讨了文本自动分类的特征和方法。内在评价在高级修订分类(基于表面的与基于文本的)中表现出良好的性能。外部评价表明,我们的自动修订分类方法可以用来预测作家的进步。
This paper explores the annotation and classification of students’ revision behaviors in argumentative writing. A sentence-level revision schema is proposed to capture why and how students make revisions. Based on the proposed schema, a small corpus of student essays and revisions was annotated. Studies show that manual annotation is reliable with the schema and the annotated information helpful for revision analysis. Furthermore, features and methods are explored for the automatic classification of revisions. Intrinsic evaluations demonstrate promising performance in high-level revision classification (surface vs. text-based). Extrinsic evaluations demonstrate that our method for automatic revision classification can be used to predict a writer’s improvement.