Efficient -Helix Induction in a Linear Peptide Chain by N-Capping with a ridged-tricyclic Diproline Analogue
Efficient -Helix Induction in a Linear Peptide Chain by N-Capping with a ridged-tricyclic Diproline Analogue
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.201302014
复制
发表时间:
2013-09-02
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Schmalz, Hans-Guenther
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hack, Verena;Reuter, Cedric;Schmalz, Hans-Guenther
The recognition of short amino acid sequences forming an αhelical motif represents an important event in many protein–protein interactions (PPI), and misfolding of such motifs is often associated with diseases, including cancer and HIV.[1–3] Accordingly, the search for synthetic compounds stabilizing or mimicking the relevant secondary structure while properly presenting the key interaction residues to the recognizing protein surface constitutes a great challenge.[4] As the key structural properties defining the PPI of interest and their contribution to the free energy of the PPI are mostly not known, it would be attractive to identify these properties by using modified linear peptides with a defined (stabilized) secondary structure. However, conformational stabilization of a linear peptide is a complex task and several strategies were developed to address this problem. For instance, the helical propensity can be enhanced by means of a chemical linkage between the side chains of i and i+ 4 residues.[5] Another concept uses unnatural oligomers such as peptoids [6] or ß-peptides [7] adopting a helical conformation. Since mostly the surface built by the side chains of the residues i, i+ 3 and/or i+ 4, and i+ 7 is important for α-helix recognition, conformationally restricted scaffolds that orient functional residues in spatially defined positions (resembling the amino acid side chains) are promising mimics of short α-helical peptides.[8] An elegant concept was introduced by Kemp and co-workers who devised conformationally restricted diproline templates positioned at the N-terminus of a peptide.[9] By preorienting the first four hydrogen bonds they achieved a bias in favor of the α-helical secondary structure. However, the effects were not particularly pronounced owing to the biconformational behavior of the used scaffold in which the two proline units were bridged by a flexible thiomethylene unit and only one of two conformers (equally populated in solution) exhibited the desired helix-inducing properties.[10] Supported by molecular modeling, we envisioned that the scaffold ProM-5 [11](1), that is, a Pro-Pro analogue made rigid by means of an ethylidene bridge, should display better properties than the α-helix-inducing N-cap presented by Kemp [9, 10] because it should exhibit a more or less monoconformational behavior (Figure 1).