Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective
复制标题
语用辩证视角的谬误
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Grootendorst
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. H. Eemeren;R. Grootendorst
在实践二元方法中，在目标是成功解决争端的讨论中，谬论被认为是不正确的举动。在这样的批判性讨论的各个阶段（对抗，开放，论证，结论）的各个阶段，都给出了十个规则。考虑到所有传统上被认为是谬论的言语行为，谬论被讨论为违反这些规则的行为。特殊关注的是，在日常语言使用中，隐含性在谬论中所扮演的角色。强调的是，在普通讨论中识别和承认谬论始终具有有条件的特征。讨论了二元视角，标准处理和谬误分析的形式逻辑方法之间的差异。
In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed that identifying and acknowledging fallacies in ordinary discussions always has a conditional character. Differences between the pragma-dialectical perspective, the Standard Treatment, and the formal logic approach to fallacy analysis are discussed.