Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling.

Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Spivey MJ
Spivey MJ
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pezzulo G;Barsalou LW;Cangelosi A;Fischer MH;McRae K;Spivey MJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

扎根理论假定没有中央模块的认知模块。根据这一观点,所有认知现象,包括被认为是莫达尔认知省(例如推理,数字和语言处理),最终都基于(并从)各种身体,情感,感知和运动过程中。认知的发展和表达受到认知剂的体现以及沉浸在其沉浸式的各种背景因素(身体和社会)的体现。扎根的框架已获得了许多经验确认。尽管如此,很少有明确的计算模型在感觉,运动和情感过程中实现基础是认知的固有,并且证明了基础理论可以机械地实现更高的认知能力。我们提出了扎根认知和计算建模之间的新联盟,朝着新型的多学科企业:计算扎根认知。我们阐明了这种新颖方法的定义特征,并强调使用认知机器人的方法的重要性,该方法允许同时考虑接地,体现和位置的多个方面,从而显示了它们如何限制认知的发展和表达。
Grounded theories assume that there is no central module for cognition. According to this view, all cognitive phenomena, including those considered the province of amodal cognition such as reasoning, numeric, and language processing, are ultimately grounded in (and emerge from) a variety of bodily, affective, perceptual, and motor processes. The development and expression of cognition is constrained by the embodiment of cognitive agents and various contextual factors (physical and social) in which they are immersed. The grounded framework has received numerous empirical confirmations. Still, there are very few explicit computational models that implement grounding in sensory, motor and affective processes as intrinsic to cognition, and demonstrate that grounded theories can mechanistically implement higher cognitive abilities. We propose a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling toward a novel multidisciplinary enterprise: Computational Grounded Cognition. We clarify the defining features of this novel approach and emphasize the importance of using the methodology of Cognitive Robotics, which permits simultaneous consideration of multiple aspects of grounding, embodiment, and situatedness, showing how they constrain the development and expression of cognition.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013126
发表时间: 2010-10-01
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Ferri, Francesca;Stoianov, Ivilin Peev;Gallese, Vittorio
通讯作者: Gallese, Vittorio
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.007
发表时间: 2010-08-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Domahs, Frank;Moeller, Korbinian;Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
通讯作者: Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
DOI: 10.1038/nn827
发表时间: 2002-04-01
影响因子: 25
作者:
Haggard, P;Clark, S;Kalogeras, J
通讯作者: Kalogeras, J
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
发表时间: 2003-07-29
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Barsalou, LW
通讯作者: Barsalou, LW
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611429578
发表时间: 2012-02-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Goslin, Jeremy;Dixon, Thomas;Ellis, Rob
通讯作者: Ellis, Rob