A knowledge economy paradigm and its consequences
A knowledge economy paradigm and its consequences
复制标题
知识经济范式及其后果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Soete
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Soete
20世纪80年代和90年代，“积极劳动力”市场改革开放了欧洲的劳动力市场，使其更加灵活，同时又不危及社会保障保护模式的本质。英国、斯堪的纳维亚国家和荷兰等在此类“积极劳动力”市场改革中走得最远的国家不仅失业率下降，而且就业参与率显着提高，特别是在劳动力市场中代表性不足的群体中。今天的挑战看起来或多或少相似，但这次是关于知识的。有趣的是，那些在“激活”劳动力市场和开发功能更好的社会福利模式方面最成功的欧盟成员国在知识投资方面表现最好。这表明，成功地促进知识投资可以产生公共资源，用于开发能够应对快速变化，特别是21世纪全球变化的社会福利模式。
During the 1980s and 1990s "Active labour" market reforms opened up labour markets in Europe, making them more flexible without putting in jeopardy the essence of the social security protection model. Countries that went furthest in such "active labour" market reforms such as the UK, the Scandinavian countries, and the Netherlands witnessed not just reductions in unemployment, but also impressive increases in employment participation rates, particularly among underrepresented groups in the labour market. The challenge today appears more or less similar, but this time with respect to knowledge. Interestingly, it is those EU Member States that have succeeded most in "activating" their labour markets and developing better functioning social welfare models that have performed best in terms of knowledge investments. This suggests, that success in boosting knowledge investment generates the public resources for the development of social welfare models capable of addressing rapid change, and in particular the global changes of the 21st Century.