Why Did Leopards Kill Humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Wildlife Management in and Around Urban National Parks
Why Did Leopards Kill Humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Wildlife Management in and Around Urban National Parks
复制标题
为什么豹子在孟买杀死人类而不是在内罗毕？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Calas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Landy;E. Rodary;B. Calas
为什么豹子在孟买杀死人类而不是在内罗毕？我们最初的假设是，一种与城市管理更加协调的不同形式的公园管理可能可以解释内罗毕没有发生豹子袭击人类的原因。我们推测这两个领域的参与者会协调努力，以确保更好地监管野生动物。这一假设并未得到证实。相反，我们看到了一些因素的重要性，例如豹子对家犬种群的捕食、公园与城市之间界面的景观配置以及自然或社会差异表现的多样性，这些因素产生了不同的脆弱性。这就得出了关于南半球国家的国家轨迹在环境问题方面的作用及其对理解我们与自然关系的新方式的贡献的两层结论。
Why did leopards kill humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Our initial hypothesis was that a different form of park management, more in harmony with that of the city, might explain the absence of leopard attacks on humans in Nairobi. We speculated that the actors in the two spheres coordinate their efforts to ensure better oversight of wildlife. This hypothesis was not confirmed. Instead, we see the importance of factors such as predation by leopards on populations of domestic dogs, the landscape configurations of the interfaces between park and city, and the diversity of representations of nature or social disparities, which generate differing vulnerabilities. This leads to a two-level conclusion regarding the role of the national trajectories in these countries of the Global South in respect of environmental concerns and their contribution to the new ways of understanding our relation to nature.