Do English textbooks reflect the actual use of English ? : the present perfect and temporal adverbials

Do English textbooks reflect the actual use of English ? : the present perfect and temporal adverbials
复制标题

英语教科书是否反映了英语的实际使用情况?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kazuko Fujimoto
Kazuko Fujimoto
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kazuko Fujimoto

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

Fujimoto(2003)指出,日本大学生和高中生在学习和使用现在完成时时有依赖时间状语的倾向,如果没有教科书和语法书上提供的典型时间状语的帮助,他们似乎很难使用现在完成时。根据Schlüter(2006)对主要语料库研究的比较,只有不到50%(29%至45%)的完成式与时间状语一起使用(第143页),他的发现得到了Hundt&Smith(2009)的证实。在后一项研究中,只有不到35%的现在完成时与时间状语共现(32%到34%之间)(第63页)。McGrath(2013)的评论,“教科书。。。影响教师教什么和学生学什么,在某种程度上也影响了学生的学习方式“(P.xii),激发了我对教材的语料库分析。本研究的目的是检验日本出版的高中英语教材是否提供了现在完成时和时间状语的真实用法,并将教材语料库与本族语语料库进行了比较。
Fujimoto (2003) states that Japanese university and high school students have a tendency to depend on temporal adverbials in their learning and using the present perfect and that they seem to have difficulty in using the present perfect without the help of typical temporal adverbials which textbooks and grammar books provide. According to Schlüter’s (2006) comparison of major corpus-based studies, less than 50% (between 29% and 45%) of the present perfect instances are used with temporal adverbials (p. 143), and his findings were confirmed by Hundt & Smith (2009). In the latter study, less than 35% of the present perfect instances co-occur with temporal adverbials (ranging between 32% and 34%) (p. 63). McGrath’s (2013) comment, “the textbook . . . influences what teachers teach and what and to some extent how learners learn” (p. xii), motivated my corpus-based analysis of textbooks. The aim of this study is to examine whether English textbooks published in Japan for high school students provide the real use of the present perfect and temporal adverbials, comparing a textbook corpus with native speakers’ corpora.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
池野修;能登原祥之;他8名;数研出版株式会社編集部
通讯作者: 数研出版株式会社編集部