Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials.
Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1177/1740774515598334
复制
发表时间:
2015-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Sugarman J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Califf RM;Sugarman J
The need for high-quality evidence to support decision-making about health and health care by patients, physicians, care providers, policymakers is well documented. However, serious shortcomings in evidence persist. Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) that use novel techniques and emerging information and communication technologies to explore important research questions rapidly and at a fraction of the cost incurred by more “traditional” research methods promise to help close this gap. Nevertheless, while PCTs can bridge clinical practice and research, they may also raise difficult ethical and regulatory challenges. In this article, the authors briefly survey the current state of evidence that is available to inform clinical care and other health-related decisions and discuss the potential for PCTs to improve the current state of affairs. They then propose a new working definition for pragmatic research that centers upon fitness for informing decisions about health and health care. Finally, they introduce a project, jointly undertaken by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory and the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), which addresses 11 key aspects of current systems for regulatory and ethical oversight of clinical research that pose challenges to conducting PCTs. In the series of articles commissioned on this topic in the current issue of Clinical Trials, each of these aspects receives its own dedicated article, with a special focus on the interplay between ethical and regulatory considerations and pragmatic clinical research that leverages innovative designs and new technologies and networks to inform “real-world” choices about health and health care.