Straddling two continents and beyond three worlds? The case of Turkey’s welfare regime
Straddling two continents and beyond three worlds? The case of Turkey’s welfare regime
复制标题
跨越两大洲、跨越三个世界的土耳其福利制度案例？
DOI：
10.1017/npt.2017.30
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
E. Yörük
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin Powell;E. Yörük
翻译后摘要本文的目的是考虑如何土耳其已被分类在福利制度的文献，并在什么基础上，它已被分类。然后，这将成为探索各种办法和方法之间和/或“立场”（例如，作者的位置或语言。对土耳其福利制度的研究在方法和结论方面表现出很大程度的差异，几乎没有达成共识。在土耳其语研究中（以及一些但不是所有用英语写作的土耳其学者），似乎确实有一个广泛的共识，即土耳其可以被归类为南欧福利模式的一部分，这与英语研究的模态结论一致。然而，一些“区域”研究的结论是，土耳其是中东和北非地区的一部分，而许多聚类分析表明，各种各样的集群在地理上并不相邻。
Abstract This article aims to consider how Turkey has been classified in the welfare regime literature, and on what basis it has been classified. This will then form the basis for exploring whether there appears to be any variation between approaches and methods and/or between the “position” (e.g., location or language) of the authors. Studies of Turkey’s welfare regime exhibit a significant degree of variation in terms of both approaches and conclusions, resulting in little in the way of consensus. Among Turkish-language studies (and some, but not all, Turkish scholars writing in English), there does seem to be a broad consensus that Turkey may be classified as part of the Southern European welfare model, which squares with the modal conclusion of the English-language studies on the topic. However, some “regional” studies conclude that Turkey is part of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, while many of the cluster analyses suggest a wide variety of clusters that are not geographically contiguous.
DOI：
10.2307/2073705
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Esping-Andersen
通讯作者：
G. Esping-Andersen