Legal pluralisms, justice and spatial conflicts: New directions in legal geography
Legal pluralisms, justice and spatial conflicts: New directions in legal geography
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/geoj.12247
复制
发表时间：
2018-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Robinson;Nicole Graham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Robinson;Nicole Graham
批判性法律多元主义既承认法律的多重来源和形式，也承认它们在单一地理空间内的动态相互作用，无论它们被定义在什么尺度上。这一主题部分的文章挑战了法律和管辖权的传统结构，借鉴了法律多元化、正义和空间冲突的思想，探讨了多种法律在特定和不同的地理环境中的经验、相互作用、影响和可能性。这些文章涵盖了广泛的地理范围和对法律概念的多元化方法，呈现了来自澳大利亚、英国、柬埔寨、印度尼西亚、美国、泰国和新西兰奥蒂亚罗阿的新鲜分析和新颖的案例研究，共同反映了法律地理学家丰富的结构和多样化的工作方向。它们提出了关于法律作为一种活的实质性和作为法律代理人的位置的重要和具有挑战性的问题。
Critical legal pluralism acknowledges both the multiple sources and forms of law, and their dynamic interaction, within singular geographical spaces at whatever scales they are defined. Challenging conventional constructs of law and jurisdiction, the articles in this themed section draw on the ideas of legal pluralism, justice and spatial conflict to explore the experience, interaction, impact and possibilities of the plurality of laws in particular and diverse geographical contexts. Encompassing a wide‐ranging geographical scope and pluralistic approach to the idea of law, these articles present fresh analyses and novel case studies from Australia, UK, Cambodia, Indonesia, USA, Thailand and Aotearoa New Zealand, which collectively reflect the richly textured and diversely oriented work of legal geographers. They raise important and challenging questions about law as a living materiality and about place as a legal agent.