Comparison of Three Head-Controlled Mouse Emulators in Three Light Conditions
Comparison of Three Head-Controlled Mouse Emulators in Three Light Conditions
复制标题
三种头控鼠标模拟器在三种光照条件下的比较
DOI：
10.1080/07434610802640745
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
William O. O'Neill
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Meaghan M Fitzgerald;Brenda A. Sposato;Patricia Politano;J. Hetling;William O. O'Neill
将三个红外头控鼠标模拟器（HeadMouse Extreme™、Tracker Pro™ 和 Tracker Inside™）与增强替代通信 (AAC) 设备 (Pathfinder™) 配对，并在三种不同的光照条件下测试速度和准确性。 11 名参与者测试了系统，输入了 AAC 用户使用的常用语句列表。 Language Activity Monitor™ (LAM) 记录了所做的所有选择。分析数据的错误率和选择率。结果表明，(a) 在单一光照条件下，不同的鼠标模拟器的表现彼此显着不同，(b) 一般来说，单个鼠标模拟器在所有光照条件下的表现一致，(c) 在所有光照条件下，外部鼠标模拟器的速度和准确性都优于内部模拟器。
Three infrared head-controlled mouse emulators (HeadMouse Extreme™, Tracker Pro™ and Tracker Inside™) were paired with an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device (Pathfinder™) and tested for speed and accuracy in three different light conditions. Eleven participants tested the systems, entering a list of common statements used by AAC users. The Language Activity Monitor™ (LAM) recorded all selections made. The data were analyzed for error rate and selection rate. The results revealed that (a) in a single light condition, the different mouse emulators performed significantly differently from each other, (b) in general, a single mouse emulator performed consistently across all light conditions, and (c) the external mouse emulators performed better than the internal emulator, for speed and accuracy, in all light conditions.