Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis
Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
Smith, Jonathan A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smith, Jonathan A.
本文提出了采用从三个主要数据库中获得的解释性现象学分析（IPA）的研究综述的结果：科学，Medline和Psychinfo。在1996年至2008年之间，介绍了经验IPA研究的293篇论文。随着时间的推移趋势。接下来是该语料库内容区域的分类。 IPA中最大的研究领域是疾病经历，它构成了近四分之一的科目。然后，本文描述了评估IPA研究的指南，该指南用于评估疾病体验论文。提供了评级为好的论文的详细摘要。这些摘要描述了实质性发现以及高质量的标记。该论文以高质量IPA工作的核心功能摘要结束。
A This paper presents the results of a review of studies employing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) obtained from three of the major databases: web of science, medline and psychinfo. Between 1996 and 2008, 293 papers presenting empirical IPA studies were published. Trends over time are presented. This is followed by a categorisation of the content area of that corpus. The biggest specific area of research within IPA is illness experience, it forming the subject of nearly a quarter of the corpus. The paper then describes a guide for evaluating IPA research which is used to assess the illness experience papers. Detailed summaries are provided of the papers rated as good. These summaries describe the substantive findings as well as the markers of high quality. The paper finishes with a summary of core features of high-quality IPA work.